Three numbers in one headline
The reported case bundles three separate cash flows. Separating them is the first step, because only one of them is an annuity.
Open full size
$4,600 a month is the Retirement Account payout — a scheduled drawdown of a single pot of money. $30,000 a year is interest thrown off by a separate balance of more than $1 million sitting in her Ordinary and MediSave Accounts, which is not being drawn down at all. Together they make the $85,000 a year, or roughly $7,000 a month, of total CPF income.
The distinction matters. The payout is capital being consumed on a schedule. The interest is yield on capital being preserved. One has an end date; the other does not. Most of the commentary around cases like this treats them as the same thing, which is how a reader ends up with the wrong target.
| Component | Monthly | Annual | Source balance | Behaviour |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retirement Account payout | 4,600 | 55,200 | ~622,000 | Drawdown. Capital depletes; scheme stops at 90. |
| Interest on OA + MediSave | 2,500 | 30,000 | 1,000,000+ | Yield. Capital preserved; continues indefinitely. |
| Total CPF income | 7,100 | 85,200 | 1,620,000+ | Tax-exempt in Singapore. |
The machine, in four accounts
CPF is not one pot. It is four, each with its own interest rate, its own lock, and its own rules about what may enter and leave.
| Account | Rate | Purpose | What happens at 55 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ordinary (OA) | 2.50% | Housing, education, investment, insurance | Swept into the RA to help meet the retirement sum; balance above it is withdrawable |
| Special (SA) | 4.00% | Retirement savings only | Closed since January 2025 — the balance moves to the RA, then any excess to the OA |
| MediSave (MA) | 4.00% | Healthcare, premiums; capped at the Basic Healthcare Sum ($79,000 for those turning 65 in 2026) | Untouched; overflow above the cap is redirected |
| Retirement (RA) | 4.00% | Funds the monthly payout | Created at 55 from SA and OA savings |
| Age band | Total contribution | → OA | → SA / RA | → MediSave |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35 and below | 37% | 62.17% | 16.21% | 21.62% |
| Above 35 – 45 | 37% | 56.77% | 18.91% | 24.32% |
| Above 45 – 50 | 37% | 51.36% | 21.62% | 27.02% |
| Above 50 – 55 | 37% | 40.55% | 31.08% | 28.37% |
| Above 55 – 60 | 34% | 35.30% | 33.82% | 30.88% |
| Above 60 – 65 | 25% | 14.00% | 44.00% | 42.00% |
| Above 65 – 70 | 16.5% | 6.07% | 30.30% | 63.63% |
| Above 70 | 12.5% | 8.00% | 8.00% | 84.00% |
The quiet constraint
For a member past 55 who has already met the Full Retirement Sum, the RA share of any new contribution is redirected to the Ordinary Account instead. Employment income stops building the payout at that point. Everything above the FRS has to arrive as a deliberate top-up — which is the entire mechanism behind this case.
The interest engine
Extra interest is paid in tiers, and for members past 55 the first tier is worth twice what it used to be.
The headline 4% is a floor, not the whole rate. On top of it the Government pays extra interest on combined balances: below 55, 1% on the first $60,000; from 55, 2% on the first $30,000 and 1% on the next $30,000. For a member past 55 the first $30,000 in the Retirement Account therefore earns 6%, the next $30,000 earns 5%, and everything beyond earns 4%.
In cash terms the tiered bonus is worth a fixed $900 a year once the RA exceeds $60,000. That is trivial against a $600,000 balance — but it was not trivial in 2010, when it was worth 0.49% on top of the base rate. The tiers front-load the return, which rewards getting money in early rather than getting a lot of money in later.
r(B) = 4% + 900 ÷ B (for B ≥ $60,000)
worked: B = 100,000 → 4.90% | B = 300,000 → 4.30% | B = 622,000 → 4.14%
The ceiling caps what you put in — never what it becomes
This single rule is the whole case. Everything else is arithmetic that follows from it.
From 55, a member may top up the Retirement Account to the current year's ceiling. Before 2016 that ceiling was the prevailing Minimum Sum. From 2016 it became the Enhanced Retirement Sum, set at 1.5 times the Full Retirement Sum. From 2025 it was reset to four times the Basic Retirement Sum — a step change that raised it by 38% in a single January.
The critical detail is what counts against the ceiling. The top-up limit is measured against the principal you have set aside, not the balance you hold. Interest already credited does not consume your headroom. So each January the ceiling moves up, the member tops up the increment, and the interest earned on everything below simply accumulates on top, permanently outside the cap.
Over sixteen years this produces the divergence in the chart above: a principal line that tracks the ceiling exactly, and a balance that ends 46% higher than the ceiling it was never allowed to exceed.
| Year | Top-up ceiling | Increment | Change | Regime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 123,000 | — | — | Minimum Sum |
| 2011 | 131,000 | +8,000 | +6.5% | |
| 2012 | 139,000 | +8,000 | +6.1% | |
| 2013 | 148,000 | +9,000 | +6.5% | |
| 2014 | 155,000 | +7,000 | +4.7% | |
| 2015 | 161,000 | +6,000 | +3.9% | |
| 2016 | 241,500 | +80,500 | +50.0% | ERS introduced at 1.5 × FRS |
| 2017 | 249,000 | +7,500 | +3.1% | |
| 2018 | 256,500 | +7,500 | +3.0% | |
| 2019 | 264,000 | +7,500 | +2.9% | |
| 2020 | 271,500 | +7,500 | +2.8% | |
| 2021 | 279,000 | +7,500 | +2.8% | |
| 2022 | 288,000 | +9,000 | +3.2% | |
| 2023 | 298,200 | +10,200 | +3.5% | |
| 2024 | 308,700 | +10,500 | +3.5% | |
| 2025 | 426,000 | +117,300 | +38.0% | ERS reset to 4 × BRS |
| 2026 | 440,800 | +14,800 | +3.5% | current |
| 2027 | 456,400 | +15,600 | +3.5% | announced |
Two windfalls did a third of the work
The 2016 introduction of the ERS opened $80,500 of headroom in one year. The 2025 reset to 4 × BRS opened another $117,300. Those two Januaries account for $197,800 of the $303,000 topped up after 55 — 65% of it. The thirteen ordinary rungs averaged $8,092 a year, about $674 a month. That is the part a normal household can actually replicate; the windfalls were policy, not planning.
The ledger, year by year
Sixteen Januaries, reconstructed from the published ceilings and the published interest rules. Ages assume a 55th birthday in 2010 and payouts starting at 70 in 2025.
| Year | Age | Ceiling | Top-up | Cumulative principal | Interest credited | Balance, 31 Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 55 | 123,000 | — | 123,000 | 5,520 | 128,520 |
| 2011 | 56 | 131,000 | 8,000 | 131,000 | 6,061 | 142,581 |
| 2012 | 57 | 139,000 | 8,000 | 139,000 | 6,623 | 157,204 |
| 2013 | 58 | 148,000 | 9,000 | 148,000 | 7,248 | 173,452 |
| 2014 | 59 | 155,000 | 7,000 | 155,000 | 7,818 | 188,270 |
| 2015 | 60 | 161,000 | 6,000 | 161,000 | 8,371 | 202,641 |
| 2016 | 61 | 241,500 | 80,500 | 241,500 | 12,226 | 295,367 |
| 2017 | 62 | 249,000 | 7,500 | 249,000 | 13,015 | 315,881 |
| 2018 | 63 | 256,500 | 7,500 | 256,500 | 13,835 | 337,217 |
| 2019 | 64 | 264,000 | 7,500 | 264,000 | 14,689 | 359,405 |
| 2020 | 65 | 271,500 | 7,500 | 271,500 | 15,576 | 382,482 |
| 2021 | 66 | 279,000 | 7,500 | 279,000 | 16,499 | 406,481 |
| 2022 | 67 | 288,000 | 9,000 | 288,000 | 17,519 | 433,000 |
| 2023 | 68 | 298,200 | 10,200 | 298,200 | 18,628 | 461,828 |
| 2024 | 69 | 308,700 | 10,500 | 308,700 | 19,793 | 492,121 |
| 2025 | 70 | 426,000 | 117,300 | 426,000 | — | 609,421 |
| Totals | 303,000 | 426,000 | 196,000 | 621,900 |
Where the money came from
$123,000 was the Minimum Sum swept into the account at 55 — money already inside CPF. $303,000 arrived as top-ups over sixteen years. $196,000 was credited as interest and cost nothing. Interest is 32% of the final account despite the member holding it, on average, for only about eight years.
Reverse-engineering the payout
Her cohort is on the Retirement Sum Scheme, not CPF LIFE. That is a drawdown, and a drawdown has a closed-form solution.
Under the Retirement Sum Scheme, the monthly payout is calculated to last up to 20 years from the payout eligibility age of 65 — that is, to about 85 — with extra interest used to stretch payouts as far as 90. Starting at 70 leaves a 15-year horizon on that basis. The required capital is a standard present-value calculation.
B = P × [ 1 − (1+i)−n ] ÷ i where i = 1.041/12 − 1 = 0.32737%
for P = $4,600:
n = 180 (to age 85) → B = $624,907
n = 240 (to age 90) → B = $763,842
n = 300 (to age 95) → B = $878,036
The reconstruction closes
The ledger produces $621,900 at age 70. The 15-year drawdown requirement for a $4,600 payout is $624,907. The model lands 0.5% below the published figure, using nothing but the ceiling schedule, the 4% floor and the extra-interest tiers. The reported record is not an anomaly — it is the arithmetic working exactly as written.
| Balance at 70 | To 85 (15y) | To 90 (20y) | To 95 (25y) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 400,000 | 2,944 | 2,410 | 2,097 |
| 500,000 | 3,681 | 3,012 | 2,621 |
| 621,900 | 4,578 | 3,746 | 3,259 |
| 750,000 | 5,521 | 4,517 | 3,931 |
| 1,000,000 | 7,361 | 6,023 | 5,241 |
What actually happens at 55
The Retirement Account is created for you. What you are allowed to take out, and what taking it out costs, is where most of the damage is done.
On your 55th birthday CPF opens a Retirement Account and sweeps money into it — Special Account first, then Ordinary Account — until the Full Retirement Sum is met. Anything above that stays in the OA and is freely withdrawable, in as many separate withdrawals as you like. If your balances fall short of the FRS you can still take out $5,000 unconditionally.
Then comes the decision that quietly costs more than any other in the system. If you own property with a lease running to at least age 95, you may pledge it, set aside only the Basic Retirement Sum in cash, and withdraw the difference. In 2026 that frees $110,200 on the spot.
| At 55 you set aside | Cash freed | Payout from 65 | Given up | And |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full Retirement Sum — $220,400 | — | 1,780 | — | Nothing to refund later |
| Basic Retirement Sum — $110,200, property pledged | 110,200 | 950 | −830 / mo | The withdrawn sum must be refunded with accrued interest when the property is sold |
The pledge is a loan you repay in payouts
Giving up $830 a month to free $110,200 means the forgone payouts have repaid that cash by age 76 — and then keep running for the rest of your life. To break even you would need to earn about 6% a year on the released money for a decade, and even then you are only level with the payouts you would have collected by 85. It can still be the right call if you need liquidity now. It is rarely the right call if you simply want the money out.
Two smaller rules worth knowing
Members born in 1958 or later may withdraw up to a further 20% of their retirement savings at 65. And online withdrawals are subject to a daily limit of $50,000, which is adjustable but takes effect only after a cooling period — worth setting before you need it, not on the day.
Why she is the last of her kind
A drawdown pays more per month than an annuity on the same money. It also stops.
Members born before 1958 default to the Retirement Sum Scheme; those born from 1958 with at least $60,000 in the RA go into CPF LIFE, the national annuity. On an identical $621,900 balance the two schemes behave very differently. The drawdown pays about $4,578 a month and ends. The annuity pays about $3,579 a month — 78% as much — and never ends.
Cumulative payouts cross at about age 89. Before that the drawdown is ahead; after it, the annuity pulls away without limit. That is the trade the newer cohorts have been moved into: a lower monthly cheque in exchange for removing the possibility of outliving the money. On current Singapore longevity, a large share of 70-year-olds will reach the crossover.
| Cumulative by age | 80 | 85 | 90 | 95 | 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drawdown (RSS) | 552,000 | 828,000 | 828,000 | 828,000 | 828,000 |
| Annuity (CPF LIFE) | 429,500 | 644,300 | 859,000 | 1,073,800 | 1,288,500 |
The ceiling is fixed.
What you build above it is not.
The arithmetic above is the whole of what CPF will do for you — a guaranteed floor with a hard limit attached. In one free 45-minute live session we show how options can be structured for a rise, a fall, or a decisive move — and where they sit beside US stocks and Singapore property.
What CPF LIFE actually pays
The Board publishes the payout table. Dividing through it recovers the annuity factor — which is what lets you price any balance, not just the six on the list.
| RA at 55 | RA at 65 | Payout from 65 | as % of RA | RA at 70 | Payout from 70 | as % of RA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50,000 | 82,400 | 490 | 0.595% | 105,127 | 670 | 0.637% |
| 110,200 BRS | 170,100 | 950 | 0.558% | 211,827 | 1,280 | 0.604% |
| 150,000 | 227,900 | 1,250 | 0.548% | 282,150 | 1,670 | 0.592% |
| 220,400 FRS | 330,100 | 1,780 | 0.539% | 406,492 | 2,380 | 0.585% |
| 300,000 | 445,600 | 2,380 | 0.534% | 547,015 | 3,170 | 0.580% |
| 440,800 ERS | 650,100 | 3,440 | 0.529% | 795,821 | 4,580 | 0.576% |
The factor, and what it is worth
The implied monthly annuity factor settles at about 0.529% of the balance at 65 and 0.576% at 70 for large accounts, drifting higher for small ones. Deferring from 65 to 70 lifts the payout by up to 7% a year — a compounded 35% uplift, plus five more years of interest on an undrawn balance. Break-even against starting at 65 arrives at about age 85.
Choosing the plan
Three plans, one irreversible choice. It changes the shape of the income, not the size of the pot.
Anyone reaching 65 with at least $60,000 in the Retirement Account is included in CPF LIFE automatically. The Standard Plan is the default, and most members never actively choose. The three plans differ in how much of the RA is converted into annuity premium, and in whether the monthly figure stays flat or climbs.
| Plan | Premium from RA | Starting payout | Shape | Bequest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard default | All of it | 100% | Level for life | Premium paid less payouts received |
| Basic | 10–20% | ~85–90% | Level, but can step down once balances fall below $60,000 | Largest, up to about age 90 |
| Escalating | All of it | ~80% | Rises 2% every year, for life | Larger early, smaller later |
monthly amounts cross at age 76
cumulative income crosses at age 87
cumulative income, Standard = 100
age 75 → 88 | age 80 → 93 | age 85 → 98 | age 90 → 103 | age 95 → 109 | age 100 → 115
What the crossover actually asks you
Escalating does not beat Standard on total money until about 87. It is not an investment decision and it is not a way to get more — it is insurance against a long life in which prices keep rising. Standard is the right default for most people precisely because it forces no bet. Basic is the outlier: it buys a bequest with monthly income, and it is the only one of the three whose payout can fall.
Running the same play in 2026
The ceiling that took her sixteen years to climb now starts at $440,800. The identical discipline produces a materially larger result — and a lifelong one.
Take a member turning 55 in 2026 who sets aside the ERS of $440,800 and then tops up the increment every January to age 70. The ceiling is published through 2027 and projected at 3.5% a year thereafter. The result below is calibrated so that the no-top-up case reproduces the CPF Board's own published estimate of $4,580 a month at 70.
| Year | Age | ERS ceiling | Top-up | Cumulative principal | RA balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 55 | 440,800 | — | 440,800 | 432,072 |
| 2027 | 56 | 456,400 | 15,600 | 456,400 | 465,528 |
| 2028 | 57 | 472,400 | 16,000 | 472,400 | 500,715 |
| 2029 | 58 | 488,900 | 16,500 | 488,900 | 537,798 |
| 2030 | 59 | 506,000 | 17,100 | 506,000 | 576,955 |
| 2031 | 60 | 523,700 | 17,700 | 523,700 | 618,264 |
| 2032 | 61 | 542,000 | 18,300 | 542,000 | 661,814 |
| 2033 | 62 | 561,000 | 19,000 | 561,000 | 707,794 |
| 2034 | 63 | 580,600 | 19,600 | 580,600 | 756,199 |
| 2035 | 64 | 600,900 | 20,300 | 600,900 | 807,227 |
| 2036 | 65 | 621,900 | 21,000 | 621,900 | 860,983 |
| 2037 | 66 | 643,700 | 21,800 | 643,700 | 917,673 |
| 2038 | 67 | 666,200 | 22,500 | 666,200 | 977,316 |
| 2039 | 68 | 689,500 | 23,300 | 689,500 | 1,040,129 |
| 2040 | 69 | 713,600 | 24,100 | 713,600 | 1,106,240 |
| 2041 | 70 | 738,600 | 25,000 | 738,600 | 1,175,876 |
| Strategy | Principal in | RA at 70 | Payout from 70 | In 2026 dollars |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Set aside the FRS at 55, no top-ups | 220,400 | 406,500 | 2,380 | 1,644 |
| Top up to the ERS once at 55 | 440,800 | 795,800 | 4,580 | 3,164 |
| Top up to the ERS every January to 70 | 738,600 | 1,175,900 | 6,767 | 4,673 |
The marginal deal
The fifteen incremental top-ups cost $297,800 and raise the monthly payout from $4,580 to $6,767 — an extra $2,187 a month for life. At that rate the additional capital is returned in about eleven years of payments, before counting the mortality pooling that makes the annuity worth more than its cash flows to a long-lived member.
The marginal dollar
The payout per dollar falls as the account grows, which is why people assume diminishing returns. Dividing it properly shows the opposite.
The intuition that the last dollar into the Retirement Account is worth less than the first is widespread, and the average figures appear to confirm it: fifty thousand dollars set aside at 55 buys $13.49 of monthly payout per thousand, while the full Enhanced Retirement Sum buys only $10.39. That looks like a clear case of diminishing returns.
It is not. Compute the marginal rate — what each additional thousand buys, rather than what the whole stack averages — and it is flat at essentially ten dollars all the way up.
| Set aside at 55 | Payout from 70 | Average per $1,000 | Marginal per $1,000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 50,000 | 675 | 13.49 | — |
| 110,200 BRS | 1,282 | 11.63 | 10.09 |
| 150,000 | 1,672 | 11.15 | 9.79 |
| 220,400 FRS | 2,381 | 10.80 | 10.08 |
| 300,000 | 3,171 | 10.57 | 9.92 |
| 370,000 | 3,873 | 10.47 | 10.02 |
| 440,800 ERS | 4,580 | 10.39 | 9.99 |
Why the average falls but the margin does not
The declining average is entirely the first $60,000 doing its work. That slice earns 6% and 5% under the extra-interest tiers and carries the highest annuity factor, so it drags the average up and then stops. Above the Basic Retirement Sum every further dollar buys the same ten dollars of monthly payout. There is no efficiency argument for stopping short of the ceiling — only a liquidity one.
Which raises the sharper question: if you intend to top up every January anyway, how much does the opening set-aside matter at all? The ladder tops up to the prevailing ceiling regardless of where you started, and unused headroom carries forward. All three paths below therefore converge on identical principal.
| Set aside at 55 | Top-ups still needed | Principal by 70 | RA at 70 | Payout from 70 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 110,200 BRS | 628,400 | 738,600 | 1,153,431 | 6,638 |
| 220,400 FRS | 518,200 | 738,600 | 1,160,913 | 6,681 |
| 440,800 ERS | 297,800 | 738,600 | 1,175,877 | 6,767 |
The set-aside is a $129 decision. The ladder is a $5,400 one.
Starting at the Basic sum and laddering produces $6,638 a month; starting at the Enhanced sum and laddering produces $6,767. The $129 gap is one year of the 1.5-point spread between Ordinary and Retirement Account interest on the money you did not commit early — and it widens the longer that money sits in the OA. Against it, the ladder itself moves the payout from $1,282 to $6,638. If you are deciding where to put your attention, it is not the opening balance.
One correction to a common claim
The $8,000 top-up tax relief does not apply to the set-aside at 55. Relief is available only on cash top-ups under the Retirement Sum Topping-Up Scheme, and only up to the Full Retirement Sum. The transfer that creates your Retirement Account is an internal movement of Special and Ordinary Account money, and earns nothing at tax time. The relief boundary is a ladder decision, not a set-aside decision.
The levers, ranked
Ordered by effect on the eventual payout per unit of effort, not by how often they get written about.
- 01Top up to the prevailing ceiling every Januarythe whole case
The ceiling counts principal only. Interest accrues outside it permanently, and a January top-up earns a full year of interest that a December one does not.
- 02Defer the payout start to 70up to +35%
Up to 7% more for each year deferred, plus five extra years of compounding on an undrawn balance. Break-even against starting at 65 lands near age 85.
- 03Move OA to SA before 55, and OA to RA after+1.5% p.a.
A 150bp rate pickup on money that was going to sit inside CPF regardless. Irreversible — which is the price of the pickup.
- 04Claim the top-up tax relief while it still applies$16,000 relief
Up to $8,000 for yourself and $8,000 for family each year — but only on top-ups up to the Full Retirement Sum. Everything above the FRS earns nothing back at tax time.
- 05Do not withdraw at 55 just because you can×1.84 by 70
A dollar left in the Retirement Account at 55 is worth about $1.84 by 70 before it converts to payout. The Board notes that cohort payouts would be higher had members not taken lump sums.
- 06Let MediSave overflow workpassive
Once MediSave reaches the Basic Healthcare Sum, further contributions are redirected into retirement savings automatically. No action required.
- 07Watch the policy reset windows$197,800 here
Retirement sums are announced two years ahead. When the ceiling formula itself is reset — 2016 and 2025 — the headroom opens all at once, and only for those holding cash ready to deploy.
What the arithmetic does not price
The model is clean. The decision is not.
Irreversibility. Top-ups to the Retirement Account cannot be reversed, withdrawn or redirected. The Ministry of Manpower confirmed in January 2026 that CPF LIFE members cannot opt out of having top-ups streamed into the annuity. Money that goes in is committed for the rest of your life.
Liquidity. $426,000 locked at 4% is $426,000 that cannot meet a medical bill, a family emergency, or a business opportunity. The payout is excellent; the optionality forgone is real and does not appear anywhere in the return calculation.
Bequest asymmetry. Under the drawdown scheme, unpaid balances including interest pass to beneficiaries. Under CPF LIFE, beneficiaries receive the premium paid less payouts already made — not the interest, which is pooled to fund other members' longevity. A member who dies early has, in effect, subsidised the ones who live long. That is what the insurance is.
Inflation. The Standard Plan pays a level nominal amount. At 2.5% inflation a payout starting in 2041 loses a third of its purchasing power by 2058. The Escalating Plan starts about 20% lower and rises 2% a year; whether that trade is worth taking is a longevity bet, not a maths question.
Rate risk. The 4% floor on SA, MediSave and RA monies is extended by the Government one year at a time — currently to 31 December 2026. It is not statutory in perpetuity. Every projection here, including the Board's own, assumes it holds.
Opportunity cost. 4% guaranteed is an extraordinary risk-free rate. It is also a long way below long-run equity returns, and the ceiling means you cannot use CPF to compound a large sum anyway. The new life-cycle investment scheme arriving in the first half of 2028 will offer a middle path, with two to three providers, capped fees and a glide path that liquidates into the RA before the payout age.
Run it on your own numbers
Same engine as the report: ceiling ladder, 4% floor, tiered extra interest, derived annuity factors.
Retirement Account projector
Enter the year you turn 55 and the amount set aside in the Retirement Account at that point. Everything stays in this page; nothing is stored or sent.
- Set aside at 55
- —
- Top-ups after 55
- —
- Interest earned
- —
- RA at payout start
- —
- Monthly payout, CPF LIFE
- —
One-page reference
Every 2026 figure this report depends on, in one place.
| Parameter | 2026 | 2027 | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic Retirement Sum | 110,200 | 114,000 | Half the FRS |
| Full Retirement Sum | 220,400 | 228,000 | Set aside automatically at 55 |
| Enhanced Retirement Sum | 440,800 | 456,400 | Four times the BRS since 2025; the top-up ceiling |
| Ordinary Account rate | 2.50% | — | Floor |
| MediSave and Retirement rate | 4.00% | — | Floor extended to 31 December 2026 |
| Extra interest, 55 and above | +2% / +1% | — | First $30,000, then next $30,000 |
| Basic Healthcare Sum | 79,000 | — | Fixed for life at 65 |
| Monthly salary ceiling | 8,000 | — | Annual ceiling $102,000 |
| CPF annual limit | 37,740 | — | All contributions, mandatory and voluntary |
| Top-up tax relief | 8,000 + 8,000 | — | Self and family; cash top-ups only, capped at the FRS |
| Unconditional withdrawal at 55 | 5,000 | — | Even if the FRS is not met |
| CPF LIFE auto-inclusion | 60,000 | — | RA balance at 65 |